Skip to main content

Public goes nutellay crazy for AI design (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

Nutella hit the headlines in February this year after using an algorithm to produce millions of unique labels in Italy. The jars flew off the shelves with customers keen to get their hands on a one-of-a kind jar. Each label design was completely unique with only the Nutella logo remaining the same.

The ad agency responsible for the campaign described each jar as “a piece of art” stamped with a unique code enabling it to be authenticated by collectors. The labels might not be works of art in a traditional sense but can still be protected by copyright, despite being computer generated. The Copyright Designs and Patents Act makes provision for work generated by computers, including with regard to ownership. However, computer generated work will only receive protection for 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which it was made, so the length of protection is significantly shortened.

In addition to copyright protection, brands typically keep packaging consistent to enable customers to easily recognise their products, which assists in providing passing off protection. For mass marketed goods, if brands opt for the more unique (and possibly in future more personalised) one-off design approach then they should consider what key elements should remain consistent in order to still enable customers to easily identify their product and maintain their passing off protection. Nutella achieved this by retaining the white lid, jar shape and logo.

But not everyone was pleased with Nutella’s approach. The campaign sparked debate that traditional designers will be replaced by computers. It seems more likely that algorithms will be tools to assist designers, rather than replace them. The generation of content by algorithms may have some challenges but certainly plenty of opportunities too.

 

Related items

Playing with fire: user-generated content on Twitter (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

The strange world of Twitter, where brands engage with their customers at their peril. The main lesson learned from the recent #WalkersWave Twitter promotion is one that brands have heard before: the British public love nothing more than a piss-take.

Get me a #covfefe (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

In case you missed it, the 45th President of the United States recently took his habit of late night tweeting to a new low. Presumably meaning to rail against the ‘mainstream media’ coverage, Trump instead complained of “negative press covfefe” and trailed off mid-sentence. Cue ridicule and the hashtag #covfefe trending on Twitter.

All hands on deck as creative industries and search engines tackle online piracy (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

The UK Government, through the UKIPO, Ofcom and DMCS, has helped broker an agreement between Google, Bing, the BPI and Motion Picture Association over a new voluntary code of practice.

To UPC or not UPC – implementation of Unified Patent Court delayed (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is intended to provide a regional forum resolve patent disputes. At the moment, parties have to litigate patent disputes on a country by country basis across Europe, which is time-consuming, expensive and can lead to differing decisions in some countries. UPC decisions will have effect in all 25 states participating in the UPC, providing a single forum to resolve these disputes.

Give me a break…KitKat latest developments (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

Last month the Court of Appeal gave us the latest decision in the long running battle between Nestle and Cadbury. Interestingly, whilst agreeing that the well-known four- fingered chocolate snack should not be registered as a 3D trade mark, all three Lord Justices chose to give their own judgment. And for Nestle, this one might just take the biscuit.

Champagne supernova: Cristal brand owner sues cava producer (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

Do you know your Champagne from your Cava? Quite possibly, but a High Court judge held in late 2015 that a Spanish cava producer trading under the brand name, “Cristalino” had used a confusingly similar sign to that of the famous tipple preferred by rappers and the like, “Cristal”.

Clash of the Titans: Google v Uber (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 5)

23 June 2017

In February, Waymo, part of Google’s parent company, sued Uber for theft of confidential information. Allegedly, a former employee of Waymo, who had been a key part of Google’s driverless car initiative, took 14,000 files and then shortly jumped ship to start up his own autonomous vehicle company. A short time later, Uber acquired the start-up for $680 million.

Brands & Intellectual Property

Maximising brand power forms the heart of commercial strategy for businesses in nearly every industry, whether major names or start-ups with big ambitions.

Back To Top