It takes two to make a thing go right...! The two-part possession hearing
09 November 2020
On 27 March 2020, all possession claims and evictions (save for a few exemptions) were stayed as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic. Fast forward to 20 September 2020, and the stay has been lifted, but there are new arrangements released by the Master of the Rolls “The Overall Arrangements” which deal with how the Court intends to return to hearing possession claims and the challenges it faces. Most important to note is the introduction of a “Review Hearing”.
The Review Hearing
Cases (stayed and new) will ordinarily proceed with a Review Hearing, which in claims that were stayed will take place after a valid reactivation notice has been filed and served in accordance PD55C on which see our InBrief Reactivation Notice: Pursuant to Practice Direction 55C.
For new claims, issued on or after 21 September 2020, the court will not fix a hearing date when it issues the claim, and as above will proceed with a Review Hearing.
The Court will give notice to the parties of at least 21 days of the Review Hearing.
The Review Hearing will be heard by a Judge on the papers who will determine whether the claim is ready or suitable to be listed or relisted for a substantive hearing. There is no extra fee payable for the Review Hearing.
What happens at the Review Hearing and who should attend?
The hearing will last no longer than 5 minutes and will take place at the end of the Judge’s daily list so presumably between 3 and 4pm.
Despite the Judge dealing with the hearing on paper, i.e. he or she will not see the parties, the parties are still required to attend the hearing either in person or by telephone/video conference. This is to provide the defendant with an opportunity to obtain advice from the duty adviser and to allow the parties to discuss the matter and see is a compromise can be reached or agree any directions. If the parties reach a compromise or agree directions, the Judge will be on hand to approve the same. If agreement is not reached either on the claim or directions the Judge will consider the bundle (on which see below) and provided everything is in order, the Judge will list the mater for a Substantive Hearing 28 days later.
The Electronic Bundle
An electronic bundle must be submitted by the Claimant to the Court 14 days before the Review Hearing. The Claimant will also have to serve a hard/paper copy of the bundle on the Defendant in addition to providing an electronic copy if the Defendant is able to receive it that way. The Claimant will therefore have to produce an electronic and paper bundle.
What must the Electronic Bundle contain?
- "All required material" (see below for further details);
- Confirmation that a paper bundle has been provided to the Defendant (with an electronic copy in addition where the defendant is able to receive that);
- Confirmation that the bundle includes all required material, specifically including enhanced information about the Defendant;
- Confirmation that the Claimant will be available during the day of the Review Hearing to discuss the case (by telephone would be sufficient with the defendant or a duty
scheme (or other) adviser.
What is "all required material"?
There is no definition nor guidance from the Overall Arrangements as to what constitutes “all required material”. However, it is safe to assume that the Judge will want to take into account as much information as possible, and therefore the bundle should include the following;
- The Claim Form and Particulars of Claim;
- The Tenancy Agreement;
- The Notice seeking possession;
- An up to date rent statement for at least the previous two years;
- Witness Statements and Certificates of Service;
- Previous court orders and notices from the Court;
- Any relevant interparty correspondence;
- A draft order for directions if applicable;
- The enhanced information about the Defendant and how the Coronavirus pandemic has affected them and any dependants; and
- The confirmations mentioned above.
It’s important to note that if the bundle is not in order, the Judge may dismiss the claim for possession. If the Judge dismisses the claim on this basis, the Claimant is entitled to apply for reconsideration at an oral hearing.
21 September 2020 onwards |
New proceedings may be issued and served or Reactivation notices may be filed and served in stayed claims issued pre 03 August 2020 |
Any time |
File may be Covid marked |
Service of claims plus 14 days |
Defence filed |
Some point post issue |
Review Date fixed |
At least 21 days from Review Date |
Notice of Review Date to Claimant and Defendant |
14 days from Review Date |
Claimant to lodge bundle with Court and provide copy to Defendant |
Review Date |
Review takes place. No attendance before Judge. Free early advice available to Defendants and an opportunity for negotiation and agree an order, failing which a date will be set for a Substantive Hearing |