Skip to main content

Sport Disputes

The sports disputes team at Lewis Silkin has a wealth of experience of advising on all forms of dispute resolution within the sports sector including litigation in the civil courts as well as domestic and international arbitration in sport specific tribunals like the Court of Arbitration for Sport and FIFA’s Dispute Resolution Chamber.

The sports disputes team at Lewis Silkin has a wealth of experience of advising on all forms of dispute resolution within the sports sector including litigation in the civil courts as well as domestic and international arbitration in sport specific tribunals like the Court of Arbitration for Sport and FIFA’s Dispute Resolution Chamber.

We work closely with our clients to resolve their disputes effectively by providing clear and practical advice and our in-depth knowledge of the sports industry ensures that our clients pursue the right strategy from the outset.

Our recent sports disputes experience includes:

  • Representing an international footballer in proceedings at the Court of Arbitration for Sport;
  • Acting for one of the UK’s largest football intermediary organisations in a FA Rule K arbitration.
  • Representing a large football investment company in a multi-million pound High Court claim against a leading international football club;
  • Advising a prominent motor-racing team in relation to a contractual dispute with one of their former drivers;
  • Advising a leading Premier League football club in relation to brand protection and an unlawful use of the club’s trade mark; and
  • Acting for a high profile Premier League football player in a dispute with his former intermediary regarding commission payments.

The team also works closely with the members of the sports disciplinary team who have extensive experience of dealing with on and off field disciplinary issues at the highest level. More information regarding the sports disciplinary team’s experience can be found here.


Related items

Contract law update: Recent developments and practical tips

02 May 2019

We would like to invite you to our next seminar where we will be discussing recent developments in contract law.

JJ Shaw takes questions from City A.M - Legal Q&A: Why Rugby Australia can terminate Israel Folau's contract – and what he can do about it

18 April 2019

In an article for City A.M, JJ Shaw explains the regulatory workings behind Rugby Australia's decision to terminate Israel Folau's contract over anti-gay social media posts, and how the player can contest the sanction.

A guide to the litigation process including guidance on the disclosure pilot scheme

21 March 2019

If you are involved in a dispute you need to know: what options there are for resolving the dispute; what litigation involves; the steps from the start of proceedings to trial; what parties to proceedings have to do; the fundamentals of court procedure; how to use legal advisers efficiently and cost effectively; and what happens after judgment.

Andrew Wanambwa writes for Accountancy Daily: Section 2 notices raise risk level for accountants

18 March 2019

Professional services firms, requests for documents and Section 2 notices under Criminal Justice Act 1987 could pose a risk for accountants and auditors as illustrated in the recent Omers case at the High Court, explains Andrew Wanambwa, in an article for Accountancy Age.

Supreme Court decision on professional negligence and loss of chance: Perry v Raleys Solicitors

21 February 2019

The Supreme Court has upheld the appeal of a firm of solicitors defending a professional negligence claim and helpfully reiterated well-established principles about the approach the court must take when considering the issue of causation in loss of chance cases. The decision clarifies what has to be proved in cases where the question for the court depends on what: (a) the claimant would have done (which the claimant must prove to the usual standard ‘on the balance of probabilities’); compared with (b) what others would have done (which are better assessed on a loss of chance basis).

Going out on a limb - English courts and overseas defendants: jurisdiction challenges and the “three limb” test

06 February 2019

When a dispute involves a foreign party or events that took place in another jurisdiction, questions often arise as to where the dispute should be determined. The forum in which the dispute is determined can make a great deal of difference. It is therefore important for potential litigants to know where they can commence proceedings and whether they can resist claims brought against them in the “wrong” jurisdiction. In a recent case the English Court of Appeal considered the test that will apply when deciding whether to permit a claimant to sue a “foreign” defendant in this jurisdiction. This article was originally published in the Commercial Litigation Journal in the March/April edition.

Back To Top