Skip to main content

Real Estate Disputes

We deal with all types of property dispute.

This includes: 

  • land acquisition, development and use, commercial landlord & tenant, housing and residential, property finance/insolvency and negligence
  • money claims, enforcement and injunctions, declaratory relief, emergency applications, and bespoke claims under statute

We deal with investors, developers, landlords, tenants, corporate occupiers, retailers, registered providers, banks and high net worth individuals.

We litigate in all forums: Privy Council and Appeal Courts, High Court & County Court, property and other tribunals, arbitration and expert determination and ADR/mediation. 

We have particular expertise and experience in:

  • rights of light, easement and restrictive covenant matters
  • site clearance – including squatters and large scale protester action
  • leasehold consents
  • break clauses
  • rent review and other property valuation disputes (including overage)
  • dilapidations
  • property insolvency
  • housing management
  • enfranchisement
  • ADR (including arbitration, expert determinations and mediations)

We also advise clients on how to avoid disputes and minimise property-related risk.  

Related items

Dispute Resolution Update - July 2018

27 July 2018

Welcome to our July 2018 Dispute Resolution Update which brings you news and our views on law and practice for dispute resolution. We’ve included articles on domestic disputes and international disputes, including summaries of recent cases. We have also included client guides on key aspects of dispute resolution.

Tom Merrick comments for LexisNexis: Requirement for non-reliance clause to be reasonable upheld (First Tower Trustees Ltd and anor v CDS (Superstores International) Ltd)

26 July 2018

Discussing the Court of Appeal decision in First Tower Trustees, Tom Merrick advises that sellers and landlords need to take extreme care in ensuring that replies to pre-contract enquiries are accurate and up to date and be alive to the potential risks in enforcing non-reliance clauses.

Legal Professional Privilege

06 July 2018

This guide is intended to provide a brief overview of legal professional privilege. It also identifies some practical steps which will help to maintain privilege and concludes with a privilege “flowchart” and table of commonly used terms.

Supreme Court delivers key judgment on the availability of Wrotham Park “negotiating” damages

02 July 2018

The Supreme Court has considered an important question in relation to damages. In what circumstances can damages for breach of contract be assessed by reference to the sum the claimant could hypothetically have received, known as Wrotham Park damages, in return for releasing the defendant from the obligation he had failed to perform?

You’ve started – so you’ll finish

11 June 2018

Claimants commencing proceedings in the Courts of England and Wales may not be able to end those proceedings simply by serving a notice of discontinuance and can be required to take the matter to trial. In this case the claimants were not permitted to discontinue their claim for the recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award under the New York Convention.

Dispute Resolution Update - May 2018

24 May 2018

Welcome to the May 2018 Dispute Resolution Update which brings you news and our views on law and practice for dispute resolution. We’ve included articles on domestic disputes and international disputes, including summaries of recent cases. We have also included client guides on key aspects of dispute resolution.

Supreme Court upholds requirement to record variations in writing

24 May 2018

Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited is an important case. In fact, the opening paragraph of Lord Sumption’s judgment describes it as an “exceptional” appeal, raising “truly fundamental issues” of contract law.

Construction Law Update – Fighting back against “Smash and Grab” Adjudications

21 May 2018

The case of Grove Developments Ltd v S&T (UK) Ltd (February 2018) is worthy of note, not least because it potentially provides employers with a quick means of reclaiming the loss suffered, following a “smash and grab” adjudication by starting its own adjudication on the true value.

Back To Top